FCA begins phase two of 'statistically significant' RDR review

Carmen Reichman
clock

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has sent emails to 120 advisory firms asking them to complete a questionnaire that will form the basis of part two of its three-pronged review into the impact of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

FCA technical specialist Rory Percival told delegates at the Institute of Financial Planning (IFP) conference on Tuesday that the review will be more "statistically significant" than the first, which looked into firms' compliance with adviser charging. Percival said: "We always said that we are going to have three cycles of this. The first cycle, that we published the results of in July, was always intended to be quite supportive of the industry, giving indications early on about what good and poor practice looks like. "The follow-up cycles are going to be more like 'OK, you've had th...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

Tim Sargisson
clock 13 January 2016 • 3 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •