Discretionary fund management (DFM) is "poorly named" as a way of communicating the bespoke nature of the investment approach, Brooks Macdonald's Andrew Denham-Davis has said.
The firm's business development director was speaking at a roundtable organised by Discus on the current state of the DFM market and was responding to a claim that DFMs were ‘closet trackers'. "DFM, I think, is poorly named because a unit trust is just managed on a discretionary basis," he said. "So are you talking about bespoke management or are you talking about model portfolios?" Denham-Davis suggested the claim DFMs were ‘closet trackers' had been driven, to a degree, by the focus on cost through the second iteration of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II). ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes