PA360 North: CII/SJP qualification was well-intentioned 'mistake'

Now accessible to all

Hannah Godfrey
clock • 2 min read

A PFS member director has apologised for the "mistake" the body made teaming up with St James's Place (SJP) to create a vulnerable client qualification, and offered a behind-the-scenes look at the situation.

In September, the Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) - of which the Personal Financial Society (PFS) is part - launched a vulnerable client qualification exclusive to SJP partners and advisers. The qualification was initially set to be exclusive to SJP for two years before being rolled out to the wider sector, but following backlash from advisers, the CII and SJP agreed to open up the pilot more widely.  SJP had been working with the CII for the last two years to develop the Level 6 qualification. It was initially designed to help SJP advisers develop a detailed and holistic understa...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

The news editor's Friday Night Takeaway from 1 May

Isabel Baxter
clock 01 May 2026 • 3 min read
Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Will support Dementia UK over the next two years

Professional Adviser
clock 01 May 2026 • 1 min read
Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

'In many cases, one parent will meet a greater share of the children’s financial needs'

Clizia Motterle
clock 01 May 2026 • 4 min read