Asset Allocator's Soapbox: Investec's Saunders and King

Philip Saunders and Max King, multi-asset portfolio managers at Investec, give five reasons to be positive

clock

Philip Saunders and Max King, multi-asset portfolio managers at Investec, give five reasons to be positive.

At the start of the year, we agreed with the consensus view that this would be a good year for investment markets, but disagreed on timing. Others expected a good first half but difficult conditions thereafter, while we expected the reverse. It has been easy to be lulled into complacency as the market advanced only to slip back into despair in each of the two setbacks, but it is important to keep a sense of perspective. In our view: 1. Global equities are, by historic standards, showing exceptionally good value on a prospective 2010 p/e of scarcely 13 and a 2011 p/e below 11. Quarterly e...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Asset Allocation

Quick fire quiz: Five questions to ask hopeful DFM partners

Five questions to ask hopeful DFM partners

Chris Mayo
clock 29 April 2015 •

Advisers asking 'wrong questions' in DFM due diligence

Advisers are not asking the right questions when doing due diligence on discretionary fund managers (DFM), one such firm has said, in response to criticism it is "impossible" to compare their costs and services.

Carmen Reichman
clock 29 January 2015 •

Asset Allocators' Soapbox: The cost of 'closet tracking'

Do 'closet' trackers unfairly tip the active v passive debate in the latter's favour?

Simon Evan-Cook
clock 08 December 2014 •