There's a difference between what the regulator expects when advisers assess suitability for a client, and what common sense demands, writes Paul Resnik...
It seems only right for an article claiming to provide an insight into suitable investment advisory processes should start with what the author views as bad practice. Then I'll follow up with an examination of what is good. First up, this article is not concerned with regulation. Regulation is imposed generally to fix an existing problem. By dint of its genesis, regulation is often imprecise and overly prescriptive. When talking with advisers around the world, it's commonly said that regulators don't understand them, their clients or the industry. In this article, I want to talk about...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes