The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is in the process of deciding how it will go about publishing its decisions, and one of the main points of contention has been whether or not it should name the firms involved.
In a recent update, it said it would almost certainly stick to its guns on the issue and name the firms, but not the complainants, involved in cases. Most business are against the idea. IFAonline sifted through some of the responses to the consultation to find out why most businesses are opposed to the publication of firm names in decisions. Reputational damage Perhaps the key concern is that publishing the name of the firm involved will damage their reputation, even if the decision goes in their favour. St James's Place Wealth Management said: "The publication of complaints d...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes