Non-solicitation clauses have been replaced by non-dealing clauses, which legal experts expect the courts to uphold. As one lawyer argues clients risk losing out, PA looks at the latest evolution in who owns the client
Non-dealing clauses effectively lock in a firm's clients for a specified period of time - usually six or 12 months - during which the client can't leave, even if their adviser does. This is different to non-solicitation clauses, which permit the client to follow their adviser as long as the client initiates contact. The rise of non-dealing clauses almost three years after the 'victory' for advisers and clients in Towry versus Raymond James is "ironic", according to a lawyer. "The case that put clients back on the map", said Alex Denny, partner at Faegre Baker Daniels, "has led to a...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes