One year on from the introduction of MiFID II, asset and wealth managers continue to struggle with much of the pan-European regulation's requirements as well as its unintended market consequences.
The second iteration of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), which came into force in January 2018, placed a raft of onerous new requirements on firms with regard to fee and performance disclosures, while adding strict restrictions on how they go about acquiring research. It was born in the wake of the financial crisis and, like other regulations that were introduced at the time, it sought to achieve greater transparency in financial markets and improve investor protection standards. Kay Swinburne MEP: What we intended with MiFID II Partner at law firm Dechert...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes