Second chance for 'unethical' firms

clock

COMPANIES once linked to "unethical practices" deserve a second chance to be included in ethical funds, according to the 10th anniversary edition of the Standard Life ethical investor survey.

The survey found 75pc of respondents believed a company which has acted unethically needed to show it had ceased activity for at least three years before it would be acceptable. The survey examined a range of investor views on issues including community involvement, employment, positive products, social impact, gambling, genetic engineering, pornography, human rights and animal testing. Respondents also said managers of ethical funds should pick companies with a pro-environmental business model which promote improving working conditions in global supply chains. Julie McDowell, secr...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Alternative Investments

Democratising finance: Alternatives and the role of financial advisers

Democratising finance: Alternatives and the role of financial advisers

The array of alternative investments is vast

J. Womack
clock 13 September 2023 • 3 min read

Andrew Aldridge: Vaccine roll out sees life science investment prospects shoot up

Andrew Aldridge

Andrew Aldridge
clock 11 March 2021 • 4 min read

Oliver Wallin: Five top tips for investing in alternatives

'Alternatives reality'

Oliver Wallin
clock 01 February 2019 • 7 min read