The FSA's Mortgage Market Review must not contain reactionary regulatory intervention, according to the Building Societies Association (BSA).
The trade body said reactionary regulation will deliver little or no benefit to consumers so the FSA needs to focus its attention exclusively on areas where there is strong evidence of failure. Paul Broadhead, head of mortgage policy at the BSA, says regulation must be proportionate to the perceived failings in the market. "If the FSA chooses to take a very prescriptive approach, this could mean many existing borrowers, who are already successfully repaying their mortgages, will find it difficult to remortgage in the future or in some instances get a new mortgage at all while many fut...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes