Providers of futures-based commodity ETPs have slammed accusations that roll costs make the products unsuitable for long-term investors.
ETPs that use futures to provide exposure to the spot price changes of a commodity are subject to the cost of replacing existing contracts as they come close to maturity. If the market is in contango, the selling price of the expiring contract is lower than the cost of its replacement and the fund will incur a loss. Conversely in backwardation, the new contract is cheaper and the fund gains. The American Securities and Litigation Consulting Group has published a paper Futures-Based Commodities ETFs claiming these costs lead to "pervasive underperformance" which "calls into questi...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes