The general consensus is (read: always has been) that the widespread mis-selling of investment bonds was the main reason behind the RDR.
Yet, even counting its overhaul of advisers' qualifications, remuneration and disclosure requirements, it is clear the regulator does not believe the RDR is enough. Now product regulation - or 'intervention' as the FSA calls it - is back on the agenda. A decade on from the introduction of stakeholder pensions and the associated RU64 rule, the FSA has put forward a raft of measures aimed at stopping products reaching the 'wrong' customers. Advisers, of course, have their own duty of care, not to mention TCF, obligations to ensure they only recommend suitable products to suitable cli...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes