Proposals for SIPP capital requirements based on assets under administration should be scrapped as it could risk consumer harm, Association of Member Directed Pension Schemes (AMPS) has told the FSA.
In a response submitted to the FSA's capital adequacy paper CP12/13 based on feedback from 82 SIPP providers, AMPS has recommended two alternative formulas for capital requirements and a revised capital surcharge based on the number of illiquid SIPPs. The first model is based on the greater of annual turnover and annual expenditure times the number of illiquid SIPPs. The second is the number of SIPPs versus the number of illiquid SIPPs. The FSA's approach could lead to undesired consequences such as SIPP operators offering low-cost, cash only SIPPs to reduce their percentage of SIPPs ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes