A number of financial advisers have yet to grasp the difference between risk-rated and risk-targeted funds, a survey of 700 practitioners suggests.
Some 15% of the 700 questioned by fund group Iveagh did not know the difference. Risk-targeted funds are usually measured using volatility in a forward looking strategy, whereas risk-ratings use historical data to give an estimation of how the fund will perform. Although the Iveagh research suggests 44% of advisers understand the difference between risk-rated and risk-targeted propositions in the market, just 2% have a proposition of this kind in place, whether it's an in-house model or outsourced to a discretionary fund manager. Of those asked, 39% admitted they need help with thi...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes