Wide range of bodies join forces to attack 'pot follows member'

clock

Organisations representing employers, consumers, workers and the elderly have joined the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) in urging the government to rethink its commitment to pot follows member.

In a letter in today's Financial Times, the unlikely coalition said the government's preferred option for consolidating small pots had a " a number of inherent risks and weaknesses". The signatories said pot follows member could expose people to repeated transaction costs as assets had to be divested and reinvested with every transfer. They added members risked being transferred from well-run arrangements to poor quality schemes and said the system could push savers into investments that had high liquidity but limited growth. They said: "The regular movement of billions of pounds o...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Pensions

Salary sacrifice change to 'hit' more than three million workers

Salary sacrifice change to 'hit' more than three million workers

Government releases impact assessment

Jen Frost
clock 05 December 2025 • 3 min read
Andrew Tully: Plummeting pensions confidence is 'siren call' for wide-reaching action

Andrew Tully: Plummeting pensions confidence is 'siren call' for wide-reaching action

'We're seeing a deep erosion of trust in the retirement system'

Andrew Tully
clock 05 December 2025 • 3 min read
When is a SIPP not a SIPP? Time for a terminology rethink

When is a SIPP not a SIPP? Time for a terminology rethink

'I would suggest that it’s time to review the use of the term SIPP,'

Caitlin Southall
clock 01 December 2025 • 4 min read