FSCS chief: We do not second guess advisers' judgements

Laura Miller
clock

The chief executive of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has defended its role, saying it does not pay out simply because appropriate investments performed badly.

The FSCS will only compensate consumers who were mis-advised by a now defaulted firm where a court would have found that a civil liability existed on the part of a solvent firm, Mark Neale said. "We do not second guess advisers' judgements. We do not protect people from ordinary investment risk where appropriate investments perform less well than expected," he wrote in his official blog. The FSCS would not "typically" decide a civil liability existed where an investor well understood the risks they were taking in following a course of action proposed by an adviser, Neale said.   ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Navigating PISCES: FCA regulation doesn't equal protection

Navigating PISCES: FCA regulation doesn't equal protection

'Those investing via PISCES, and their advisers, should scrutinise issuers and their disclosures carefully'

James Tyler
clock 28 March 2025 • 4 min read
FOS sides with Ludlow WM after client's professional representative made 'poor submissions'

FOS sides with Ludlow WM after client's professional representative made 'poor submissions'

Complaint not upheld against Ludlow Wealth Management

Isabel Baxter
clock 27 March 2025 • 3 min read
Regulators rethink D&I targets 'to avoid additional burdens on firms'

Regulators rethink D&I targets 'to avoid additional burdens on firms'

FCA and PRA to take different appraoch to diversity and inclusion

Linus Uhlig
clock 13 March 2025 • 2 min read