An article from The Times caused a backlash among financial advisers after it shed a poor light on the usefulness of life insurance.
The article from The Times (which you can read here, although there is a paywall) caused a flurry of financial advisers to jump to the defence of live cover. The article detailed a retired financial adviser, who was paying £1,500 a month for 30 policies after only paying £158 a month when he first took it out. Under the original policy, the price increased for the adviser because of high charges and poor investment returns, according to the article, and the £150,000 he was meant to be guaranteed soon dropped to £50,000. While this is an unfortunate case and disappointing for the pay...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes