The government has asked whether principal firms should be responsible for activities outside the scope of the agreements with their appointed representatives.
Under current rules, if appointed representative firms carry out unregulated activities that fall foul of the ombudsman, the body cannot always investigate the complaint and set appropriate compensation for consumer losses. This is also the case where the scope of the contract between the AR and principal does not cover the regulated area in which the consumer has brought a complaint. The ombudsman can, however, consider complaints where the AR has undertaken a regulated activity that is included in the contractual agreement between the AR and its principal. A pitfall of the current a...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes