Clive Waller explains why he is backing the trade body's decision to open its doors to restricted advisers.
Following the rather extreme reaction to the announcement that AIFA will (inevitably) admit restricted advisers, I have returned to look at all the issues again to see if my own thinking, together with far better informed people than I, are wrong on this. I re-read all FSA output on this (sad, I know). It took several hours, and I made notes. Three points strike me: In PS 10/6 3/2010, the FSA expressed apprehension that IFAs might opt for restricted status, in effect doubting their motive: “We are concerned that some respondents felt the new requirements would result in a mov...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes