The FOS and the scale of poor advice

FAIR?

Scott Sinclair
clock

If you are going to give negligent advice, just make sure it isn't too negligent - that way you might not have to compensate your client.

That is a cynic’s conclusion reached from a pair of provisional decisions published by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) last week. Two advisers (read about the first HERE, the other HERE) that invested clients in Keydata bonds were found to have given unsuitable advice, but only one is likely to have to pay redress. The reason for this seems to be that, while one IFA “completely disregarded” (in the opinion of the ombudsman) the interests of his clients and recommended they invest £60,000 in one of the bonds, the other did consider their interests and ultimately recommended his c...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

Tim Sargisson
clock 13 January 2016 • 3 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •