The overly-prescriptive RDR resulted in some unintended consequences, including the advice gap. Tim Sargisson asks if a return to commission is the right move or a backwards step
A happy new year and I very much hope that 2016 proves to be a prosperous year for everyone reading this. And what an interesting year it promises to be, with little time to draw breath as we rattle from the old year into the new. 2016 is only a few days old but already the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR) is gathering pace. It is interesting to read that an influential panel of experts, appointed by the government as part of the FAMR, is considering radical reforms to regulation which would roll back key aspects of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) to enhance access to advice...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes