Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

clock • 3 min read

The overly-prescriptive RDR resulted in some unintended consequences, including the advice gap. Tim Sargisson asks if a return to commission is the right move or a backwards step

A happy new year and I very much hope that 2016 proves to be a prosperous year for everyone reading this. And what an interesting year it promises to be, with little time to draw breath as we rattle from the old year into the new. 2016 is only a few days old but already the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR) is gathering pace. It is interesting to read that an influential panel of experts, appointed by the government as part of the FAMR, is considering radical reforms to regulation which would roll back key aspects of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) to enhance access to advice...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •
RDR

FCA: Concerns linger over adviser payments despite inducements ban

Regulator 'encouraged' by adviser firms' response but fears potential for bias remains in some firms

Scott Sinclair
clock 21 October 2015 •