There is no right or wrong answer to whether to be independent or restricted, writes David White, head of FundsNetwork.
One of the key RDR-related decisions facing advisers is that of how they choose to designate themselves, as ‘independent’ or ‘restricted’? With many advisers having a close attachment to the IFA designation, it is perhaps unsurprising that some surveys suggest that most look like they will opt to go down the ‘independent’ route. However, the decision may not be easy as the restricted designation is not without its advantages. Firstly, let’s reprise some of the reasons for being independent. Independence has the advantage of a sense of continuity with the IFA designation. In addi...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes