The recent changes to the way buy-to-let investments are taxed could turn out to be property funds' - and their investors' - gain, argues Paul Munn
Buy-to-let was once a golden egg for investors. Properties could be bought with relatively small deposits, tenants covered mortgage payments and other costs and, 20 or so years later, the investor owned a mortgage-free property and was sitting on a significant capital gain. Simple. In reality, a mortgage-free property may not always have been the end result, but only because interest-only-mortgages have been far and away the most popular option for buy-to-let investors. The attractions of buying this way were greater for most people. Since mortgage interest payments could be offset ag...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes