The 'active-passive' debate is a belief system, says James Klempster - if you believe markets are highly efficient, it makes sense to invest in passive vehicles. But, he argues, there is room for doubt
Active investment management has had a torrid time in recent years. Depending on which survey you read, the performance of the average manager has achieved somewhere between ‘bad' and ‘abysmal'. This negative perception - coupled with the significant fee savings possible in passive vehicles in combination - can, in the right hands, make a compelling case against active investment management. What is more, recent liquidity issues with a well-known investment manager has put another nail in the coffin of the so called ‘star manager' culture, adding fuel to the pro-passive pyre. And yet ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes