Following the debate over whether multi-asset funds and portfolios are good value compared with other solutions designed to achieve the same outcomes, writes Fraser Donaldson, it is reasonable to put some historical perspective on these arguments. Rome was not built in a day and all that …
It seems to me there are three separate issues in this cost debate: value for money, who is charging for what and the old active vs passive argument. Multi-asset used to be called fund of funds. But they appear to have gone through a subtle rebranding over the last ten years. Initially there was scepticism over who was benefiting the most. Funds had a bid/offer spread starting at 5% but potentially rising to double figures. The charges were wrapped up in the bid/offer spread, with a hurdle to overcome before reaching profitability. In addition, the annual management charge was only pa...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes