Why 'polluter pays' isn't as simple as it seems

'If only life was that easy'

clock • 4 min read

Don’t expect a rabbit out of the FSCS hat any time soon, writes Justin Cash

For years, the cry of the advice profession has been the same: the good advisers shouldn't be punished for the sins of the bad. A couple of rotten apples have tarnished the profession's reputation for everyone. So instead of us all paying into the compensation pot for their mistakes, can't the miscreants just pick up the tab themselves? Now, such a ‘polluter pays' idea is under serious consideration, per an FCA consultation on reforms to FSCS funding. If only life was that easy. For a start, we're going to have to agree on who the polluters are. Let's take the Woodford saga as a case ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA to lean more on Consumer Duty to swerve introducing additional regulation

FCA to lean more on Consumer Duty to swerve introducing additional regulation

Consumer Duty champion board requirement to be axed

Cristian Angeloni
clock 20 January 2025 • 2 min read
FCA adds 100 staff to Leeds office

FCA adds 100 staff to Leeds office

Increasing it by an additional 5,000 sq ft

Isabel Baxter
clock 17 January 2025 • 2 min read
Why 'polluter pays' isn't as simple as it seems

Why 'polluter pays' isn't as simple as it seems

'If only life was that easy'

Justin Cash
clock 20 December 2024 • 4 min read