Nick Britton sets out the detail of Saba Capital’s investment trust ‘attack’, why platforms need to enable easy shareholder voting and what the ongoing situation means for advisers…
There has been plenty written in the media recently about how difficult it has been for retail shareholders to vote since Saba Capital's attack on seven investment trusts – but surprisingly little on the same issues faced by advisers and their clients. While Lloyds Bank rightly bowed to pressure and found a workaround to allow shareholders to vote on three of its platforms, some providers are persisting with policies that make it difficult for advisers to vote in their clients' interests. Some adviser platforms simply do not allow shareholder voting while others charge for the privile...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes