With more and more model portfolios appearing on the market, Graham Bentley analyses whether they deliver a better outcome for investors than a simple risk-targeted fund of funds
For decades, asset managers have been marketing ‘funds of funds' (FoFs) as a simple way for investors to access hundreds of underlying securities across global stockmarkets. FoFs can be divided into two cohorts - those that can choose to invest in competitors' funds are considered ‘unfettered', while the rest have chosen to select mainly from their own in-house fund range. While, given their wider opportunity set, unfettered funds might be expected to exhibit better performance than their fettered cousins, to an extent this is offset by costs. Unfettered funds have to buy competitors' fu...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes