In the first of a new series on different aspects of the decumulation phase of retirement planning, Henry Cobbe argues liability-relative investing may be complicated but the key questions for retirement maths are not
Investing for decumulation could really be called ‘upside down investing'. In essence, it is the mirror image or opposite of accumulation. Instead of regularly paying money in to grow a pot, you are regularly taking money out to run it down. The objectives are different, the risks are different, so the strategies should be different too. When making a retirement plan for a client nowadays, advisers have to consider three questions: * How much do they have now? * How much do they need on an annual basis? * How long do they have to live? The tools for assessing suitability i...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes