SIPP provider Curtis Banks has published a list of the investments it is least likely to accept into its pensions.
The company’s ‘maybe’ list (see below) has sparked controversy among advisers and other stakeholders over responsibility for investment choice. While other providers are explicit about the investments they will and will not accept, Curtis Banks has gone a step further by asking advisers to justify why they believe their client is suitable for one of the investments on the 'maybe' list. "This means Curtis is involved in the decision to invest,” said Greg Kingston, head of marketing and technical at Suffolk Life. Kingston and others argue Curtis’s focus is on the individual client’s ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes