The upcoming anniversary of Lehman Brothers' collapse offers a timely opportunity to revisit an old question: which is better, active or passive investment management?
Five years on – almost to the day depending on when you’re reading this – from the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the start of the credit crisis, that now-familiar, sinking feeling remains: the economy is still struggling. Following the exit of Lehmans and the many other institutions that went the same way, investors sought fund managers that could soften the blow on the way down but were ready to pounce at the first sign of a recovery. And, with the costs associated with active management making headlines, many advisers turned to lower-cost passive vehicles for a solution. Were they...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes