Safe and sound: Has RDR de-risked advice?

CLUNK-CLICK

clock

It's simple, really: financial services regulation should mean a less perilous environment for investors. So has RDR de-risked financial advice?

Can investors seeking financial advice relax now? Are they safe? Here's the pitch: Advisers are (generally) better qualified than they used to be, run business models free from product or provider bias (if they're independent) and are preparing to hold more spare capital. So you, Mr investor, are safe. Come right on in. But is he safe? Have changes introduced following the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) de-risked the advice process? Some are unequivocal: A spokesperson for Towry, for instance, had the following to say: "We absolutely feel that it is safer [now] for consumers to s...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

Tim Sargisson
clock 13 January 2016 • 3 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •