It should be a redundant question, but it turns out it isn't: Who is ultimately responsible for the business written by advisers affiliated with nationals or networks?
You're a client. You approach firm A, which is, according to its website and literature, an appointed representative of regulated network B. After advice, firm A commences an investment plan, which includes some vanilla funds and a couple of unregulated investments which, don't worry, are the ones that will really give you alpha. Something goes wrong, you complain, and it turns out the adviser had not written the business through the network, but on the side, via a little venture he or she has set up. Ah. What now? Historical cases - some very recent indeed - have seen problems emerge...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes