Two recent Financial Ombudsman decisions are crucial reading for the SIPP industry. Fiona Murphy looks at the issues.
The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has recently taken two high-profile decisions on SIPPs. The first involved the FOS revisiting a ruling concerning SIPP operator Berkeley Burke, which led to questions over due diligence practices and suitability of high-risk investments. In 2011 an investor, referred to as Mr A, transferred £29,394 from a personal pension plan into a SIPP through Berkeley Burke after being introduced by an unregulated agent. He invested £24,195 in Sustainable AgroEnergy, an unregulated investment. The firm went into administration and Mr A lost his entire fund, go...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes