A legal loophole could threaten PPF payouts in the event of company insolvencies, warns Ros Altmann.
The director-general of Saga says a discrepancy over the definition of ‘employer' could put savers' funds at risk. She highlights the recent case of the George & Harding Group (G&H) pension scheme whose members may lose their savings as its parent company Zejwa is unable to pay them and the PPF lifeboat fund will not cover the losses. Altmann says there is a difference between a ‘sponsoring employer' and a ‘principle employer' in pensions law, which means the G&H pension is not eligible for help the company which collapsed due to the recession. The G&H pension scheme was taken-over...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes