Prudential has won its High Court dispute with members of its pension scheme over changing the basis on which it granted discretionary increases to pensions in payment.
In a judgment handed down today Mr Justice Newey rules Prudential had not breached the duty of good faith by deciding in 2005 that, while discretionary increases would continue to be based on RPI, they would in the future be capped at 2.5%. He says this was because the decision was not irrational or perverse. In the judgment, he says: "Even if I had been persuaded the policy had not been followed in some or all of the subsequent years, I would not necessarily have accepted that the decisions taken were irrational or perverse or otherwise breached the obligation of good faith. "To m...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes