Mistakes are commonly made when using life expectancy figures, as real lifespans are likely to be higher than quoted examples of life expectancy, the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries has pointed out.
The Institute and Faculty of Actuaries' Longevity Bulletin, argues that period life expectancy, commonly quoted as the average number of additional years a person can be expected to live for, is not realistic as it assumes mortality rates are frozen to that time period. Alison O'Connell, editor of the Bulletin, said: "Period life expectancy does not take into account likely future mortality changes, needed to produce a realistic picture of future lifespans. "Instead, cohort life expectancy, increasingly used by actuaries, demographers and policy makers, does make an allowance for ho...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes