Pensions watchdog runs up £3.2m legal bill

clock

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has spent almost £3.2m on external barrister fees over the past two years, with one-third of those costs spent on one legal case alone, figures show.

A Freedom of Information request made by IFAonline's sister title Professional Pensions revealed the regulator paid £3,180,626 to external barristers in the last 24 months on a total of 40 cases, with the amount spent on individual cases ranging from £454 to £1,053,471. TPR refused to disclose a breakdown of costs for individual cases preventing the release of information relating to legal spend on the five “moral hazard” cases – which involve Financial Support Directions (FSDs) and Contribution Notices (CNs) – it prosecuted over the period. A lawyer said fees for moral hazard cases a...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on uncategorised

Scotland Investment Roadshow 2024: Last chance to join PA in Edinburgh and Glasgow

Scotland Investment Roadshow 2024: Last chance to join PA in Edinburgh and Glasgow

The Scotland Investment Roadshow kicks off next week

Professional Adviser
clock 18 September 2024 • 2 min read

Building Society-owned Newcastle Financial Advisers acquires Openwork firm

First of a number of acquisitions

Hannah Godfrey
clock 09 December 2019 • 1 min read

Bond managers fear hedges being undermined as liquidity dries up

The recent sell off in the bond market and growing liquidity issues have forced bond investors to use similar hedging techniques, undermining their effectiveness and causing concerns about how much downside protection funds really have.

Anna Fedorova
clock 03 July 2013 •