Professional indemnity (PI) insurance will not be cheaper for restricted advisers, despite some companies "peddling" this message to the industry, according to Sense commercial director Steve Young.
Young said there were currently several restricted companies pushing the idea that attaining PI insurance will be more costly for independent than restricted firms. The argument is based on the fact that, to remain independent post Retail Distribution Review (RDR), an adviser must be able to offer advice on a wider range of products, pushing up the costs of insurance. But Young said he had spoken to "six or seven" PI brokers and insurers to try to determine whether it would be more expensive for Sense - as an independent firm - than its restricted counterparts. He said: "Undoubtedl...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes