Financial advisers could wind up paying more towards the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) unless it re-thinks proposals designed to reduce the volatility in the amount firms pay, the Association of Professional Financial Advisers (APFA) has warned.
The FSCS is proposing to change the way it calculates fees to a system based on a three-year average cost of compensation, not including 'exceptional' circumstances, to lower the chances of raising interim levies. However, in its calculations to show how this might have worked in the past three years, the FSCS did not consider the collapse of Keydata to be an exceptional event, even though it triggered the scheme's cross-subsidy model for the first time in its history. Though APFA applauded the FSCS's efforts to provide more stability and foresight of potential costs, it said it was c...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes