The nine suspected liberation vehicles at the centre of the High Court pension liberation court case are occupational pension schemes, a judge has ruled.
The High Court case, between independent trustee firms Dalriada Trustees and Pi Consulting and The Pensions Regulator (TPR), was necessary to define the legal status of the pension funds. TPR had argued the arrangements were actually personal pension schemes, making transfers into the funds illegal. However, Mr Justice Morgan ultimately decided they are occupational pension schemes as defined by the 1993 Pensions Schemes Act. Mr Justice Morgan said in his judgement: "I have concluded that the purpose of the scheme as expressed in the language of the scheme satisfies the purpose test i...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes