Research company Fundscape has hit back at criticism its gatekeeper report - which warned of a lack of quality in fund ratings - was based on flawed research.
Fundscape said its report, written in conjunction with Graham Bentley's gbi2 and published in March, was based on quantitative analysis of fund performance and had been presented in a "fair and balanced way". The report had warned some fund lists were biased and did not base their ratings on the quality of the underlying funds. But ratings firm Rayner Spencer Mills Research (RSMR) - among others - criticised the report, saying it was badly researched and based on assumptions of how rating agencies operate. The report had analysed 1,060 funds by 140 groups authorised by the Financia...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes