Victory for Ingenious in HMRC press briefing appeal

Not directly related to tax tribunal dispute

Victoria McKeever
clock • 1 min read

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of film partnership firm Ingenious in its appeals case against a controversial HMRC press briefing in 2012.

The Supreme Court ruled a background briefing to the press in June 2012 by then HMRC permanent secretary Dave Hartnett unlawfully disclosed confidential information to two journalists. The briefing predated the most recent First Tier Tax Tribunal ruling in favour of Ingenious in August, which granted partial tax relief to two of three Ingenious Film subsidiaries investigated by HMRC for tax avoidance. As such it is not directly related. Ingenious said it was "delighted" with the Supreme Court decision. It said HMRC had sought to justify the press briefing on the grounds that it wanted...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Hampshire IFA charged by FCA over £2.3m fraud

Hampshire IFA charged by FCA over £2.3m fraud

Lisa Campbell charged with multiple criminal offences

Isabel Baxter
clock 13 February 2025 • 1 min read
FCA's targeted support risks infringing on advice - PIMFA

FCA's targeted support risks infringing on advice - PIMFA

Targeted support must not step on financial advice’s toes, trade body warns

Jenna Brown
clock 13 February 2025 • 5 min read
Five vulnerability questions advisers must ask themselves

Five vulnerability questions advisers must ask themselves

'Identification. Action. Reporting – don't delay'

Jonathan Barrett
clock 12 February 2025 • 5 min read