SJP extends lead as UK's largest private asset manager

2016 PAM directory data

Victoria McKeever
clock • 1 min read

St James's Place (SJP) has consolidated its position as the UK's largest private asset manager, according to the 2016 Private Asset Managers (PAM) directory.

The wealth manager saw a year-on-year increase of 12.7% in assets under management (AUM) to reach a total of £58.6bn as of 31 December 2015. In second place, Coutts had £49.24bn in AUM at the end of 2015. With the firm having seen a less than 1% increase on the previous year's total of £48.77bn, however, the gap between first and second therefore widened from £3.23bn at the end of 2014 to £9.36bn 12 months later. The PAM directory shows Barclays in third place with £44.15bn in AUM, UBS Wealth Management fourth with £31.68bn and HSBC fifth with £29.42bn. Brewin Dolphin, Investec Wealth...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Companies

Wren Sterling makes trio of acquisitions taking AUM to £9bn

Wren Sterling makes trio of acquisitions taking AUM to £9bn

Latest buys add more than £300m AUM to the national IFA

Isabel Baxter
clock 05 March 2025 • 1 min read
Quilter's ongoing advice review bill comes in at £76m

Quilter's ongoing advice review bill comes in at £76m

Preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2024

Jenna Brown
clock 05 March 2025 • 3 min read
Aberdeen's return to vowels: 'It had no choice but to change it back'

Aberdeen's return to vowels: 'It had no choice but to change it back'

Initial rebrand an ‘expensive and confusing’ marketing mistake, advisers say

Isabel Baxter
clock 04 March 2025 • 3 min read