Tilney challenges Rathbones with rival bid for Smith & Williamson

All-cash offer

clock • 1 min read

The possible £2bn all-share merger of Smith & Williamson and Rathbone Brothers could be derailed, with wealth manager Tilney launching a rival bid for S&W.

Tilney has tabled an all-cash offer for the firm, according to Sky News, but S&W's management team, led by David Cobb and Kevin Stopps, is reportedly keen to continue to pursue a deal with Rathbones rather than the competing offer from the £23bn AUM wealth manager. A formal announcement about the terms of Rathbones' deal with S&W is expected next week, amid a wave of M&A activity in the industry. Majority-owned by private equity firm Permira, Tilney pursued growth last year via the acquisition of Towry for roughly £600m. S&W, which has roughly £19bn in AUM, was effectively put up f...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Companies

Wren Sterling makes trio of acquisitions taking AUM to £9bn

Wren Sterling makes trio of acquisitions taking AUM to £9bn

Latest buys add more than £300m AUM to the national IFA

Isabel Baxter
clock 05 March 2025 • 1 min read
Quilter's ongoing advice review bill comes in at £76m

Quilter's ongoing advice review bill comes in at £76m

Preliminary results for the year ended 31 December 2024

Jenna Brown
clock 05 March 2025 • 3 min read
Aberdeen's return to vowels: 'It had no choice but to change it back'

Aberdeen's return to vowels: 'It had no choice but to change it back'

Initial rebrand an ‘expensive and confusing’ marketing mistake, advisers say

Isabel Baxter
clock 04 March 2025 • 3 min read