Portafina has been instructed to pay compensation to a client following unsuitable advice given in 2012 that recommended she transfer her pension into UCIS funds in a self-invested personal pension (SIPP).
Mrs E, as referred to by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), held a personal pension plan (PPP) and had also accrued benefits in a defined benefit occupational pension scheme (OPS). She transferred both pensions into a SIPP and then invested the majority (87.5%) of the funds into four different unregulated collective investment schemes (UCIS). In 2016, when she tried to take some pension benefits, Mrs E discovered the funds were illiquid and so made the complaint. An investigator at the time of the complaint said it should be upheld, as the investments contained within the SIPP we...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes