FCA fines Santander £32.8m for bereavement process failings

More than 40,000 customers affected

Sophie King
clock • 2 min read

Santander has been fined £32.8m by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) for failing to process the accounts and investments of deceased customers effectively.

According to the regulator, 40,428 customers were directly affected because the bank had failed to transfer a total of £183m of funds to beneficiaries when it should have done. In some cases, the FCA said, funds were held for many years, depriving beneficiaries of the use of them for "a considerable amount of time". The regulator also said the bank failed to disclose information relating to the issues with the probate and bereavement process to the FCA after it became aware of them, thereby breaching Principle 11 between November 2013 and May 2015. Santander also breached Principle...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Moving beyond FG12/16: The evolution of investment propositions

Moving beyond FG12/16: The evolution of investment propositions

'The modern adviser requires a holistic approach'

Karl Dines
clock 21 November 2024 • 4 min read
FCA's Nikhil Rathi registers interest for top civil service job - reports

FCA's Nikhil Rathi registers interest for top civil service job - reports

FCA CEO term to end next year

Linus Uhlig
clock 19 November 2024 • 1 min read
A practical guide to getting ongoing reviews in order

A practical guide to getting ongoing reviews in order

Have you considered file checks on annual review cases?

Jennifer Peaty
clock 19 November 2024 • 6 min read