Trade association PIMFA has criticised the proposed changes to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) funding split, suggesting it will penalise firms with low levels of complaints.
The FOS is consulting on a new funding model that would see those who have more complaints sent to the ombudsman pay less to the running of it. Presently, 85% of FOS costs are paid by firms for each complaint taken to the ombudsman, while 15% of funding comes from an industry-wide levy. However, it has proposed funding costs should be split 50:50 between case fees and the levy. The Personal Investment Management & Financial Advice Association (PIMFA) said splitting the funding in half would mean firms that generate fewer complaints will greatly subsidise firms that account for the ma...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes