The long-running HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) v Parry & Ors case, otherwise known as the Staveley case, has concluded Staveley’s actions gave rise to an inheritance tax bill, bringing clarity around pension transfers or switches made in ill-health.
The Staveley case was first heard in 2014 and is based on whether inheritance tax (IHT) should be applied to a pension transfer carried out in terminal ill-health. After a difficult divorce Ms Staveley transferred part of a pension she had set up with her husband into a new pot and bequeathed it to her children. She died just weeks later. Because she was terminally ill, HMRC treated the transfer as a "transfer of value" followed by an "omission to act" as she did not draw any benefits, and applied IHT. It argued the two actions were linked and designed to reduce the value of her estat...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes