One of my serious concerns about firms' activities relates to financial protection ‘non-disclosure'. As much as consumers do have to take responsibility for their actions - ie when they say they didn't know about something and clearly did - the industry has to sort this issue out.
The matter has created negative publicity for the market again only this last week when – on the back of FOS comments – it was publicly revealed a critical illness claim was declined on the grounds of non-disclosure of medical conditions not related to the condition the claim was declined against. It is a practice the industry has applied for years, so as much as closer scrutiny of an applicant’s medical detail at the application – not the claim – stage is likely to increase costs TCF means firms can no longer hide behind this argument. When you buy private medical insurance it is clear wh...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
Signup and gain exclusive members-only insights
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes
